Evidence layer · Construction

The proof was there
all along.

The verified record of construction.

The independently verifiable evidence layer for construction projects. Site evidence scatters across inboxes and drives, so when a claim lands months later, it can't be pulled together in time.

Request a conversation No pitch, a straight conversation about whether it fits your projects.
WESTBRIDGE Data-centre fit-out
SEALED
Instruction · RFI 214 · Level 3 access delay
Captured 14 Mar 2026 · 08:42 CET · forwarded email
SHA-256a3f9 4b2e … 7c21
Independent timestamp✓ verified
Unaltered since capture✓ confirmed
The problem

When the claim lands, the proof is already scattered.

A dispute surfaces months after the work. The emails, photos, instructions and site conditions that prove your case existed all along, but they're spread across inboxes, phones and drives. Skilled people burn weeks reconstructing a record that should have been ready. Time runs out. Money is lost.

What it does

Capture and seal the record as it happens.

SiteActa is an independent evidence layer for construction projects. It captures site evidence (emails, photos, site conditions, notes and instructions) as it happens, and seals each item the moment it is captured, so the record is provably unaltered and tied to a point in time. It sits above the systems you already use, such as Aconex, Procore, Autodesk, SharePoint and email, without replacing them.

01

Capture and seal at the moment

Each item is sealed at capture and cannot be altered afterwards. Where a hash covers something less than the original message, the report says so.

02

Organise automatically

Forward an email to file it. Evidence sorts itself by project and topic, so it's there when you need it.

03

A verifiable pack in minutes

Produce a complete, independently verifiable evidence pack when a claim arrives, not weeks later.

04

Sits above your systems

Works with the tools you already run. Not another platform to log into and maintain.

05

Cross-contract responsibility answers

Ask who owns a scope item, get a clause-cited answer with gap and overlap detection.

Why it holds up

Verifiable by anyone, including the other side.

The report states what it does not contain

Every report carries a completeness section: messages referenced in the correspondence but never captured, fragments excluded from the chronology and why, messages where two captures of the same email disagree, and records without a hash of the original message. It appears whether or not anything is missing.

Verifiable without trusting us

Anyone can verify the pack, including an opposing party, without trusting the vendor.

Print it twice, get the same document

The written position is generated once, stored as a numbered version with its own SHA-256, and printed with that version and hash on the page. Regenerating creates a new version rather than overwriting the old one.

Cryptographic fingerprint at capture

Each item is sealed with a cryptographic fingerprint the moment it is captured.

Independent external timestamp

An independent timestamp fixes each item to a point in time, from a source outside our control.

Timestamps are issued by a public RFC 3161 authority. This is not a qualified eIDAS timestamp, and every pack states its own timestamp status.

What this proves is precise: that a record is unaltered since capture and tied to a time. It does not claim to prove that an event happened as described.

Contract intelligence

Know who is responsible.
Before it costs you.

Ask a plain-language question across every contract in the project — English or German. "Who is responsible for the temporary works design?" SiteActa returns a direct answer naming the contractor, backed by cited clauses with document and page references.

  • ·Scope gap detection. If no contract covers the task, the platform says so — before it surfaces on site as an expensive variation.
  • ·Overlap detection. When two contractors both appear to hold the same scope, it's flagged — before it becomes double payment or a finger-pointing dispute.
  • ·Honest by design. When evidence is thin or contracts conflict, it says "insufficient evidence" instead of guessing. Every answer cites only real clauses from the actual contracts.

Automated contract analysis — always verify against the full contract. Not legal advice.

RESPONSIBILITY ANALYSIS
Responsible: Temporary Works Contractor

The temporary works design obligation sits with the specialist contractor under the enabling-works package, clause 4.2.

Evidence Enabling Works Contract · clause 4.2 · p.12
Who it's for

Built for complex projects where the record matters.

Main contractors and construction managers on CHF 20–250M projects: pharma, data centres, complex fit-out, MEP-heavy work. Commercial directors, project directors, claims and risk teams who have seen how fast a good case falls apart when the proof can't be found.

Who's behind it

Built from the tools up.

SiteActa is built by someone with 24 years on site experience, from carpenter to senior superintendent to client representative, who got tired of watching good people lose claims, time and money they should have won, because the proof couldn't be found in time.

It's built the way site teams actually work, not the way software vendors wish they did.

DSWaldron GmbH · Wettingen
Get in touch

Request a conversation.

No pitch, a straight conversation about how it fits your projects.

Opens your email client, addressed to us. Nothing is stored on this site.

We use your details only to respond to your enquiry — see our Privacy Policy.